The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has called for Google to sell its Chrome web browser, the world’s most popular, as part of a set of remedies to curb the tech giant’s monopoly in online search.
This demand is outlined in a DOJ court filing, following a landmark anti-competition ruling in August 2023. Judge Amit Mehta found that Google illegally maintained dominance in online search, stifling competition and innovation. The DOJ has recommended additional measures, including:
- Ending exclusive contracts: Prohibiting Google from making agreements with companies like Apple and Samsung that pre-install its search engine as the default on devices.
- Oversight of Android: Imposing court oversight on Google’s Android ecosystem to prevent favoritism towards its search services and advertising monopolies.
- Restricting browser re-entry: Preventing Google from re-entering the browser market for five years if Chrome is sold.
Impact on the Industry and Competition
The DOJ’s filing, supported by several US states, argues that these remedies are essential to restoring competition in the online search and advertising markets. Government attorneys emphasized that Google’s control over Chrome and Android has created a self-reinforcing cycle, driving users to its search engine and locking out competitors.
The proposed changes aim to give competitors and newcomers a fair chance to innovate and succeed. Legal experts like Professor Laura Phillips-Sawyer of the University of Georgia School of Law have highlighted the importance of this case in breaking barriers for new entrants in the search market.
Google’s Response
Google has criticized the DOJ’s proposals, describing them as extreme and harmful to innovation. Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs, stated that the proposals “go miles beyond the Court’s decision” and would disrupt Google products valued by millions.
The company is expected to submit its counterproposals by December 20, 2024, with Judge Mehta set to make a final ruling by summer 2025.
Political Implications and Uncertain Future
The case, initiated under the Trump administration, faces potential shifts with the President-elect returning to office in January 2025. However, legal scholars like Rebecca Allensworth from Vanderbilt Law School suggest that the case will likely proceed regardless of political changes, as the plaintiff states could continue independently.
A Pivotal Moment for the Search Industry
If Judge Mehta accepts the DOJ’s proposed remedies, it could mark a turning point for the online search industry. By addressing Google’s dominance and fostering competition, these measures could open the door for innovation and new entrants to thrive, reshaping the digital landscape.
